Friday, April 26, 2019

1.Patient autonomy may indeed be one of the most central ethical Essay Research Paper

Patient Autonomy As One of the Most Central Ethical Principles in Medical Law - Research Paper vitrineFrom a moral perspective, Christman posits that individual impropriety is an idea that is gener ally understood to refer to the capacity to be ones own person, to live ones life according to reasons and motives that are interpreted as ones own and non the product of manipulative or distorting external forces.2 Christman hike extrapolates that in the western tradition, the view that individual autonomy is a basic and political value is a very much modern development. Additionally, in terms of the moral rationale for autonomy, Buss claims that to be autonomous is to be a law to oneself3. However, Buss further comments that directly correlated to the concept of autonomy is the scope for lack of accountability if we are not autonomous, which is clearly pertinent to medical consent and liability. In terms of UK law, the notion of consent, therefore, mirrors the ethical concept that in dividuals have an implied right to self-determination and autonomy. If we consider by parity the classic statement of Justice Cardozo in the US case of Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospital4 every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patients consent commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages5. Accordingly, the general legal position is that a competent adult volition be entitled to reject treatment even if this risks serious injury or death and is not in their best interests. In UK law, the general position is that lack of consent will give recrudesce to liability in the tort of battery and trespass, where a defendant will be liable for all damages resulting from the invasion even if no injury has been caused by the lack of consent6. Academic reasoning propounds that the primal purpose of obtaining patient consent to a specified treatment is to protect doctors against committing an actionable tort of battery.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.